Thursday, April 14, 2016
Islam and Progressivism
In Islam, the concept of 72 houri (virgins) refers to an aspect of Jannah (Paradise). This concept is grounded in Qur'anic text which describes a sensual Paradise where believing men are rewarded by being wed (as defined) to virgins with "full grown", "swelling" or "pears-shaped" breasts. The content of the Koran is so disgustingly pornographic that some alive men may need ghusl (ablution) after sexual discharge just for hearing certain verses. Great! Most men use the Internet for such filth. Some Islamic scholars understand Paradise to be a female slave market where you can't buy and sell women but you can have sex with them "at once." Rape, in the real world. And as WikIslam writes: "The perpetual virgins will all 'have appetizing vaginas', and that the 'penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal.' I can see why Obama love love loves Islam: It will put out of business the pharmaceutical companies that make Viagra and its many offshoots. And it fits in with the irrational fantasy that is Progressive Democraticism.
Enough of THAT fantasy.
Now let's get to the New York Times, the Megaphone of the Left as the Koran is the Megaphone of Islam. And the Alphabet of Propaganda, NBC CBS ABC CNN AP NPR PBS and last and least msnbc. And the beliefs of the President of the Democrats, Barack Obama. And the next president of the Democrats (excuse the following denunciation) The Bitter Old Biddy with Baggage. And other meaningfuls, TR, FDR and LBC. (JFK would be included but he slashed income taxes so is no longer a Democrat). To True Believers, these bringers of deception describe a world devastated by the Capitalism of Republicans, where individuals have an American Dream and the freedom to think, talk, write and act on it. But they are not True Believers of Progressivism, and so they must be muzzled. Rights end where Republicans disagree with the beliefs of True Believers. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness is so outmoded. And a written Rule of Law? How unbelieving. If you believe in YOUR (Democrat) political party, you don't need anything in writing. TRUST! NOW there are our Betters -- the Elites from university and the Democratic Party -- to lead us to Paradise, where we don't have any fears, anxieties, triggers, or responsibilities or work; a sensual Paradise where believing men and women and African Americans and Hispanics and LBGTQRSTs can do whatever they want, not just sexual intercourse with the perpetual 72. Most anything.
Saturday, April 9, 2016
THE DESTRUCTION OF DONALD TRUMP FOLLOWING UP ON THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEA PARTY: THE DESTRUCTION OF "WE THE PEOPLE"
The TRUMP Tea Party
The Tea Party was a spontaneous movement of Americans horrified by the election and inauguration of President Barack Obama. The instant impetus was a call by the CNBC television editor of its Business News Network on June 14, 1999, against Obama’s Homeowners Affordability and Stability Plan (HASP). It proved to be a ineffective program with a goal of giving away $75,000,000,000 in taxpayers’ money to help those homeowners whom he thought were cheated by greedy and dishonest bankers. Banks were to forgive principal and reduce monthly payments to 31% of a homeowner’s gross monthly income (disincentivizing success) dictating that banks chip in some and taxpayers the rest. There was no study of why homeowners couldn’t make timely payments only that the burden of guilt was on Obama’s perception that business people are dishonest and that only the federal government is capable of making it all right, and easy on homeowners. (When HASP didn’t work out, in 2009 came HAMP with its HHF – Hardest Hit Fund under TARP, the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and part of Obama’s MHA, Making Home Affordable thing -- and HARP – Home Affordable Modification Program and Home Affordable Refinance Program – to help near-underwater homeowners refinance mortgages after home prices plummeted after 2007 – which didn’t work so HARP 2.0 was dictated the end of 2011 to eliminate any limit of negative equity in refinancing. Yes, HASP HAMP HARP HHF MHA and TARP all were a TRAP. And that trap enraged many Americans who had been rational, careful and prudent and vehemently disagreed with their hard-earned tax money being used to bail out those who had not been rational, careful or prudent. Many held that Obama’s inexperience and lack of much contact with the world of commerce led him to want to give bank and taxpayer money away immediately rather than taking the time and intellectual effort to understand the problems, the causes and improvise some lasting solutions.
The Tea Party was a spontaneous movement of Americans horrified by the election and inauguration of President Barack Obama. The instant impetus was a call by the CNBC television editor of its Business News Network on June 14, 1999, against Obama’s Homeowners Affordability and Stability Plan (HASP). It proved to be a ineffective program with a goal of giving away $75,000,000,000 in taxpayers’ money to help those homeowners whom he thought were cheated by greedy and dishonest bankers. Banks were to forgive principal and reduce monthly payments to 31% of a homeowner’s gross monthly income (disincentivizing success) dictating that banks chip in some and taxpayers the rest. There was no study of why homeowners couldn’t make timely payments only that the burden of guilt was on Obama’s perception that business people are dishonest and that only the federal government is capable of making it all right, and easy on homeowners. (When HASP didn’t work out, in 2009 came HAMP with its HHF – Hardest Hit Fund under TARP, the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and part of Obama’s MHA, Making Home Affordable thing -- and HARP – Home Affordable Modification Program and Home Affordable Refinance Program – to help near-underwater homeowners refinance mortgages after home prices plummeted after 2007 – which didn’t work so HARP 2.0 was dictated the end of 2011 to eliminate any limit of negative equity in refinancing. Yes, HASP HAMP HARP HHF MHA and TARP all were a TRAP. And that trap enraged many Americans who had been rational, careful and prudent and vehemently disagreed with their hard-earned tax money being used to bail out those who had not been rational, careful or prudent. Many held that Obama’s inexperience and lack of much contact with the world of commerce led him to want to give bank and taxpayer money away immediately rather than taking the time and intellectual effort to understand the problems, the causes and improvise some lasting solutions.
The
people’s lack of any control over the president’s unilateral and wrongheaded
expenditures of hundreds of billions of THEIR dollars, led to their forming
various entities under the banner of the Tea Party. It was chaotic, with no central
leader, formal structure or agreement on issues other than a desire for a
smaller, more customer(taxpayer)-friendly government. In March, 2009, the
Taxpayer March on Washington was held as similar protests arose in cities
around the country. Ranges of attendee estimates were from 75,000 by the
left-leaning media punditry to 800,000 by the conservative FreedomWorks which
organized it. People gathered at the Freedom Plaza and marched, speaking,
singing, chanting and waving the American Flag, to Capitol Hill, where speakers
included present and former members of Congress. It was a wake-up call to the
Progressive Democrats who then began to systematically destroy the Tea Party. Paul
Krugman, chief Nobel barker of the Megaphone of the Left, the New York Times, described
its “pathological meanspiritedness.” On the Alphabet of Propaganda, NBC, CBS,
ABC, AP, CNN, NPR, PBS and “who’s watching” msnbc and its ilk came, “cheap
demagoguery,” “racism,” “War on Women,” and the capper, “the American Taliban.” Except for a further ultimate disgust attributed to
President Obama: “tea bagger,” a deeply derogatory unpresidential sexual
quote. To enrage his members before a speech by
that same hate-monger, President Obama, late 2011 in Detroit, Teamsters
President Jimmy Hoffa, Jr., had some dangerously violent comments about the Tea
Party: “Let's Take These Sons of Bitches Out!” And gaining steam, the Progressive
Democrats greatly damaged the Tea Party leaving it listless. Though it did
leave remnants in some policies of the conservative Republican Congress and
Speaker of the House of Representatives and former vice president nominee, Paul
Ryan. The mind- and truth-less Huffington Post ran a detailed piece blaming the
devils themselves, the Koch Brothers, employer to over 75,000 Americans, for
financing the very birth of what the Left had already ground into becoming
simply an annoyance with no political threat.
But then came 2015 and the initial jousting for the presidential
candidacy. And the outsider’s outsider, Donald J. Trump, speaking forcefully
and unrehearsed for the white working class feeling left behind by the
politicians. It was the angry, voiceless Tea Party suddenly with a leader. The
elites, the establishment both Democrat and Republican, were once again
awakened – threatened – by a spontaneous uprising but this time by a man with
charisma and money. And a devil-may-care disdain for their very establishment
comfort and power. Millions of Americans
were moved to action once again and voted for him as their leader, their
candidate for the president of the United States. Trump was no
read-the-Teleprompter Obama or stringently rehearsed and practiced Hillary (“The
Bitter Old Biddy with Baggage” – my description). He was authentically outspoken.
A surprisingly strong and vocal “We the People” once again
threatened the establishment…from the President of the United States of America
to Wall Street banks to union bosses, trial lawyers to Congressional patronage
with cushy jobs including hundreds or perhaps thousands of lobbyists. The easy
stasis of expropriating trillions from taxpayers to retain power was at risk.
They needed to emasculate the man.
The anti-Trump rhetoric is intense, repetitive and follows the
Progressive playbook of personal denunciation of every aspect of the man. But
“We the People” who have not been cowed or brainwashed by its effective
propaganda still believe that the country can be taken back by the people. But
up against them are the government workers implanted by Obama, union bosses who
command Obama, trial lawyers who finance the Left, the entertainment industry,
the afore-mentioned non-Wall Street Journal, non-Fox media, the educational
establishment from pre-K through Ph. D. and the administrators. But more
troubling are the Venezuelan-like people who depend on the unsustainable
deficit spending of the federal government in so many ways.
In all likelihood the next president of the United States will be
a woman who gives off the appearance of corruption and has, under the umbrella
of her husband’s blackness (dishonest-wise, not racial) and his name, been
given the unearned pedestal. She is desperately needed by the President of the
Democrats, Barack Obama, to spin into a beneficial “legacy” his abject failure;
his self-acknowledged abuse of power causing a flat domestic economy where
competitiveness and the American Dream have been replaced by the easy political
correctness of diversity, free stuff and monetizing all aspects of life,
destroying the (right from the Declaration of Independence) pursuit of
individual happiness and denouncing all the United States of America has
accomplished for the world and most everyone in it. And to alter the perception of the fact that
his international cowardness has created an unstable world threatened by
Islamic terrorism and ISIS.
Or a socialist.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)