Friday, July 26, 2013

Again Obama disregards the Rule of Law

The U. S. Supreme Court -- the final arbiter of the law -- invalidated as unconstitutional a key part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.  The ObamaHolderDemocratic Party Justice Department has discovered or invented an oblique, rarely used section of the law to replace the one struck down.  It arbitrarily or ideologically believes the U. S. Supreme Court is wrong, so rather than accept it and uphold the laws of the land as required by the Constitution and his oath, the Obama administration ignores it.  Ignores the laws it has pledged to uphold.  So it will sue Republican governors starting in Texas.  Republicans.  The enemy.  Isn't the president of the United States supposed to represent ALL Americans?  Apparently not, so in fact Barack Obama is only the President of the Democrats.  The voting rights should only be for Democrats, they believe.  Doesn't matter if they are citizens, felons or even alive.  But not all voters should be protected against the widespread (but ignored by Democrats) voter fraud, that's OK because most of it is by Democrats and its arms such as Acorn and Union thugs.

The Rule of Law is being quickly dismantled as this administration disregards what Obama says to disregard.  But with ferocity it goes after those it doesn't like.

1) It just sued for $10 BILLION dollars SAC Capital Advisors because SAC has been so successful.  In the Obama mind success equals illegal and it has coerced from five of a thousand employees of SAC guilty pleas of insider trading.  Of course there is no definition of what insider trading is.  The administration wants to show it's tough on hedge funds.  It wants to destroy it. 

2) ObamaHolder is attempting to coerce private companies to give up profits.  Private sector student loan providers are being strongarmed to be "flexible" and not force deadbeat students to have to repay loans as they had agreed.  It will cost much for these privately-owned firms to forego profits at the dictate of ObamaHolder which will lower the number of possible new employees and force the increase in prices.

3) The U. S. ObamaHolderDemocratic "Justice" (sic) Department will extort some "concessions" it arbitrarily wants, in exchange for AMR -- parent to American Airlines -- being permitted to purchase US Airways.

4)  Democrat lawmakers criticized banks owning warehouses to store metals, so the U. S. Justice (sic) Department has opened an investigation.  Something about price manipulation -- sort of like the Fed's Bernanke's manipulation, I guess -- or "extra costs" whatever they are.  As if "extra costs" are now against the law.  But the law is whatever Obama says, "extra costs" are now against the law.

5)  ObamaHolder forced Halliburton to pay $55 MILLION to the far-left-wing National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and a $200,000 fine (Huh?  $55 MILLION to a liberal political organization and $200 THOUSAND to the government???) for a supervisor deleting a computer simulation.  And that said, ObamaHolder is investigating "the possibility" of anticompetitive practices by Halliburton and others in Progressives HATED industry, one that is bringing energy independence to America.  ObamaHolder hates fracking for oil and natural gas because it beats the shit out of their BELOVED sunshine and wind power generation.  Wind (hot air) and sunny increase the energy prices for their expressed-beloved middle class.  But the administration has nothing but contempt for the middle class as proven by their policies, including the mad expenditures for hot air and sunshine.  F the middleclass, they say.


Thursday, July 4, 2013

Pleasure or Responsibility? It's a choice.


Some women disregard their responsibility.  First by choosing momentary sexual pleasure, or that of her partner, without regard to her becoming pregnant.  In all likelihood it's because she knows she can have killed any fetus who might be created and become living inside her womb.  It is Choice.  That of sexual pleasure over responsibility.  Then she has another choice when she chooses her own freedom from responsibility with no regard to the future of what her fetus might become.  Steve Jobs?  Ted Bundy?  A general in the Army?  An electrician?  A school teacher?  A identity thief?  A happy individual?  Doesn’t matter, the pregnant woman will choose to kill the real or potential human being.  Him or her gets no choice.  It is her choice of her selfishness over her choice not to give any choice to her fetus.  Another individual gets no choice.  Sure argue a fetus is not a human being.  Maybe, maybe not.  But he or she will probably be one.  He or she will probably be a human being.  One choice eliminates another choice.  LiberalProgressiveDemocrats argue that Republicans have a "war on women".  Republicans simply want choice allowed for a tiny, unprotected potential human being who can't vote.  (A death for a vote: that's fairness for you!)
Unfortunately Republicans don’t frame the argument this way.  And they lose elections, and they lose, and they lose, and they lose, and they lose, and they lose, and they lose.  And an inexperienced man with a modest intellect but good voice and a rabid ideology gets elected president.

And that is the end of the United States of America into which you I was born.


The Egyptian people had had enough of the long corrupt and oppressive Hosni Mubarak dictatorship and the people -- with the necessary assistance of American technology including the Internet, cell phones, Facebook and Twitter -- rebelled.  Mubarak read the writing on the wall and resigned.
For the first time in Egypt's history democratic mostly-free elections organized by the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces -- its military -- were held and the best- and earliest-organized political party, the Muslim Brotherhood, won a majority.  Mr. Mohammed Morsi became the president of Egypt espousing democracy, peace and economic growth.  To the contrary, during his first year in office the man's dictatorial tendencies and Muslim ideology roared out.  He rammed through a new constitution aiming at Sharia Law.  His concentration was on consolidating and expanding his own Islamist power instead of working on the rapidly-declining economy.  Tourism crashed, the currency dropped, unemployment rose and GDP growth neared nothing from seven percent a couple years ago.  Crime skyrocketed and persecution of minorities, especially Coptic Christians expanded.  National unrest rebirthed and Morsi appointed General Abdel Fattah Al Sisi an Islamist sympathizer to run the SCAF -- the military -- to calm the people.   

Six months later, a petition for him to step down was circulated and over a million Egyptians signed.  The people hit the streets once again in the hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions.  Some of Morsi's cabinet ministers, military and other advisors resigned.  While violence was sparse, Egypt was a ticking time bomb.  Gen. Al Sisi told Morsi that he needed to remedy the protests of the people or the military could step in.  On July 3, 2013, the military in essence took over, announcing it would begin setting the stage for another national election.  Morsi vanished to an "undisclosed location".

Will the civilians supporting Morsi clash or worse in the streets with the opposition?  Who knows as of 8:30 a. m. Pacific Daylight Time, July 4, 2013 in Seattle?

The United States of America in 2008 and 2012 elected a president promising to stabilize an exploded economy, create six million jobs and get the country back on the path of economic growth.  He also said he'd bring the country and its disparate factions together.  Hope and Change.

Instead, similar to President Morsi, President Obama turned his back on most non-Democrats (rewarding only his campaign contributors or those corporate leaders who could thrive on the reflected popularity of his empty personna).  American Idol: The President is alive and well!

He further divided the country with virulent denunciations of all who opposed him, including the United States Supreme Court.  Rather than expand jobs, which it turns out he has no clue how to do having never touched the private sector, he brought ideological Progressives into his administration.  They being wildly anti-capitalism and anti-free markets, not to mention anti-anyone who opposed or disagreed with their utopian fantasies.   Anti-business, pro-labor activists were added to the Department of Labor; anti-carbon-energy advocates were stuffed into the Energy Department, who immediately showered billions of dollars on Obama's campaign contributors who had "alternative" energy companies to fund.  The Environmental Protection Agency began a campaign to eliminate coal -- the source of half of America's electricity.

Financial regulators began fixing the products, services, prices and capital structures of most American financial institutions.  Threatening, investigating and suing along with rule making to bring them in line to the Progressive Central Control.  And this anti-business list of oppression goes on and on and on.  The result" barely any Gross Domestic Product growth, extraordinarily high and unmoving unemployment and nearly twenty million Americans un- or under-employed.

What Obama promised, as Morsi promised, was nothing like he set out to do.

Obama, like Morsi, could be forced to resign by Facebook, Twitter and American ingenuity and innovation, but he took control of the technology and many of its entrepreneurs.  Reflected glory impresses geeks immensely.

So it will not happen.  The anti-Republican, anti-conservative, anti-Tea Party propaganda machine that started with Franklin Delano Roosevelt is honed to a fine

From pre-kindergarten through high-school to university administrators, instructors and professors education lean and teach far-left.  The entertainment industry, from movie, sports and rock stars to the corporate owners mostly by far voted for and vocally support Obama.  Union bosses back Democrats with workers dues to keep the laws supporting union monopolies and killing any thought of corporate power. Most government workers vote for the Progressives who force bigger and bigger and more expensive government.  Most newspaper, television and other media is obvious in its support of the Progressive ideology, selecting "news" and opinions that make the president look glamorous and completely disregarding his many, many mistakes, wrongheaded decisions, and inexperience.  His stonewalling coverups of Benghazi and the Internal Revenue Outrage, where his FBI won't even investigate either, are disregarded by most of the pandering media.  They have staked their reputations on the first Black president and they are not about to be proved wrong.

And so Egypt will possibly re-rebel against oppression while the birthplace of freedom, individual responsibility and inventive federal government heads the opposite way to oppression, centrally controlled over regulation of every social and economic activity of Americans. 

Our founding fathers -- portrayed only as selfish, rich, white oppressors by LiberalProgressiveDemocrats -- inventors of the brilliant U. S. Constitution -- portrayed by LiberalProgressiveDemocrats as old fashioned and out of touch -- are rolling around in their graves shouting tearfully: "No, no, no don't let them take your freedom away."